IFs of Peaceful Afghanistan

The world has written a remarkable history of Afghanistan with blood.

American’s evacuation of Afghanistan in 2014 has raised quite a number of concerns among the localities as well as international communities. A state with a history of unending wars and uncompromising liberty can be well evaluated for its future contexts. Consequently, the concept of peaceful Afghanistan has a detailed account of “ifs” for the whole world specially comprising territories.

Intervention by former USSR has a clear comprehension now but since the face of war changed, so does the meanings of the past ventures. So, the facts and figures of triggering USSR into Afghanistan to the recent and apparent situation; the traditional conspiracy of confining Muslim Mujahideen’s sabotaged within their own region is groomed enough. The overall performance and outcomes of proceeded war by America and NATO forces have distinctively showed motives beyond the disintegration of USSR and cultivating a Uni-polar world for Afghanistan was and is Nowhere. Theory to access the Central Asian states for certain benefits have also gone astray. The possibilities to make use of the natural resources at the ground have posed off as the foulest presentation.

The present concerns and strategic attitude has worn out Afghanistan from a worth list whereas a lame and so propagated theme of PEACE establishment in an unstable region is a good talk like ever. The election in this regard describes the further prospects easily as Abdullah Abdullah accompanied by the two independents Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai and Zalmai Rassoul is a playful move. Peace is a rare commodity to Afghans and the going to be established government can’t seek it by developing a confronting set-up. Blind to the rest of the issues, the Northern Alliance and Pakhtun Taliban has no connected way.

Let’s eye what IFs in case; the foreign forces leave Afghanistan with the authority to introduce its own state machinery…

·        It is an old battle ground with tussle between the liked and non liked proportions of lead composed of Northern Alliance and Pakhtun candidates.

·        Doubtlessly, the proximate Pakhtuns of Pakistan will support the Pakhtun Taliban no matter anyone supports or not.

·        The financial assets would have no space being disrupted by the unstable make over of the government and foreign aid is simple out of question.

·        In case of civil war, the soil will b fertile by the blood and the scattered population without any doubt would divert to the most accessible regions with quite pre-experienced result.

·        In case of domestic settlements, the Mujahideen will move outward to coup up and avenge the foreign invasion on other Muslim states like Iraq, Syria, Palestine or even Egypt being toppled by the Israel.

·        The pre-stated reason may drag the west again into some sort of countering strategy involving close and cooperative states.

·        The spreading fire of tangled conflicts will introduce collective war ignorant to past paces and the prospects of planning would go futile.

This is an inevitable fixture now therefore, the blame game is pointless. The success of election in Afghanistan is a dream that would never come true, or may be an apparent turn over to draw a new scenario that might change the whole world. The probability spectrum of Afghanistan’s future is no more irrelevant to peace of any state for it would be a blunder to under-estimate the Pakhtuns even after witnessing a dread at their hands.