Pages

Apr 14, 2014

Taliban Vs Mujahedeen

The Afghan war has created quite a lot of misconceptions related to the definition of conflict. There are numerous perceptions related to the issue, its development and its aftermaths within the region as well as outside. The most apparent idea is concerned to the Talibanisation and its prevalence in the Pak Afghan regions; which is ignorant enough in its existence that it revolves around distractions only. That is why there had never been quite exclusive of this term unless it is highlighted internationally with blood oriented poster.
There is a section that believes that people are sterilized to pace forward in the name of fundamentalist concept of religious Jihad. Others believe in conspiracy theories. Some associate it to foreign aggression through intelligences which are anti-Muslim. There are groups who believe that political agencies are terrorizing masses because of being financed from outside to destabilize state. A ground to fabricate uni-polar world is what historians propose. There is a great vision among some that Taliban are made by the Pakistan military and financed by the United States therefore, they don’t have any roots of their own to prosper and groom their influence as well strength anyhow.
However, there are a number of questions that answer themselves through spectacularly undeniable historical evidences world has witnessed. There is seemingly segregation in the policy movement of the Taliban groups but it’s more of what the term comprehends in its extant. Despite, it’s not Taliban that has ever been a nightmare but the unbreakable souls that have never written a tamed antiquity. Therefore, if anyone seeks peace by confining the Talibanisation to certain territory through some proposed plan of on ground indulgence, the possibilities of concluding expanding pestilence worldwide is mere a dream.
Considering all the prospects owned by various schools of thoughts, there is a clear picture of the discussed notion but the ambiguity to the apprehension can’t be detached because of the live and analogous history of Pak Afghan Pakhtun. Let’s accept it blindly that it was just another phase of international political war on ideology that targeted Afghanistan as a timely play. There is least interest related to it except to culminate the native radical forces used at the play formerly as they have become a dread latterly. If this is the case then who has always been supporting and financing the Pakhtun Taliban…
·        In 1841 to counter against an invasion tried by the British? They were brutally defeated with none alive.
·        To fiercely confront the Israeli on the behalf of Palestinian?
·        To meet as tit for tat with Indian troops in Kashmir?
·        To move to confront the Russian attack on Chechnya throughout the period of 1994 to 1999?
·        In fighting for the Bosnia and Herzegovina?
·        To pace towards Iraq for supporting the Iraqi Muslims?
·        To cooperate in conflicting against the anti-Libyan elements?
·        To rush to combat the Assad forces and help Syrian Muslims? Etc…
Pakhtun aren’t politically aligned mentalities. They are the untamed warriors who don’t claim or acquire any writ and defy their foreseen opposite vigour by any available possible mean. If they are the groups bid by a third party’s for a foul play then why the Taliban…
·        Attempt against the Pakistan military who is dubbed to be the mentor of these insurgents?
·        Hate the Americans and the NATO forces as they are the ones financed them.
·        Cease their consummate activities to their consisting regions?
·        Challenge their existence as intangible and influencing strength that requires negotiations?
·        Move together regardless of diverse advocacy of sectarianism among themselves at certain lines?
·        Would never feel reluctant in expanding their supportive hand to the Muslims suffering at the hands of the infidels in different regions?
·        Does not vanish when they are compressed upon financing or any other support?  
It is the reign of Mujahedeen’s that occupies the land indifferent to the strategic agendas penetrating the rest of the world. Address the irresistible combats as pleases but they acknowledge blood that withstand a pillorying infidel detaining any logic of strategic policy, benefit or interest.





No comments: