The Afghan war has created quite a lot of misconceptions related
to the definition of conflict. There are numerous perceptions related to the
issue, its development and its aftermaths within the region as well as outside.
The most apparent idea is concerned to the Talibanisation and its prevalence in
the Pak Afghan regions; which is ignorant enough in its existence that it
revolves around distractions only. That is why there had never been quite exclusive
of this term unless it is highlighted internationally with blood oriented poster.
There is a section that believes that people are sterilized to
pace forward in the name of fundamentalist concept of religious Jihad. Others
believe in conspiracy theories. Some associate it to foreign aggression through
intelligences which are anti-Muslim. There are groups who believe that
political agencies are terrorizing masses because of being financed from
outside to destabilize state. A ground to fabricate uni-polar world is what
historians propose. There is a great vision among some that Taliban are made by
the Pakistan military and financed by the United States therefore, they don’t
have any roots of their own to prosper and groom their influence as well strength
anyhow.
However, there are a number of questions that answer themselves through
spectacularly undeniable historical evidences world has witnessed. There is
seemingly segregation in the policy movement of the Taliban groups but it’s
more of what the term comprehends in its extant. Despite, it’s not Taliban that
has ever been a nightmare but the unbreakable souls that have never written a
tamed antiquity. Therefore, if anyone seeks peace by confining the
Talibanisation to certain territory through some proposed plan of on ground
indulgence, the possibilities of concluding expanding pestilence worldwide is
mere a dream.
Considering all the prospects owned by various schools of thoughts,
there is a clear picture of the discussed notion but the ambiguity to the
apprehension can’t be detached because of the live and analogous history of Pak
Afghan Pakhtun. Let’s accept it blindly that it was just another phase of international
political war on ideology that targeted Afghanistan as a timely play. There is
least interest related to it except to culminate the native radical forces used
at the play formerly as they have become a dread latterly. If this is the case
then who has always been supporting and financing the Pakhtun Taliban…
·
In 1841 to
counter against an invasion tried by the British? They were brutally defeated with
none alive.
·
To fiercely confront
the Israeli on the behalf of Palestinian?
·
To meet as
tit for tat with Indian troops in Kashmir?
·
To move to
confront the Russian attack on Chechnya throughout the period of 1994 to 1999?
·
In fighting
for the Bosnia and Herzegovina?
·
To pace
towards Iraq for supporting the Iraqi Muslims?
·
To cooperate
in conflicting against the anti-Libyan elements?
·
To rush to combat
the Assad forces and help Syrian Muslims? Etc…
Pakhtun aren’t politically aligned mentalities. They are the
untamed warriors who don’t claim or acquire any writ and defy their foreseen opposite
vigour by any available possible mean. If they are the groups bid by a third
party’s for a foul play then why the Taliban…
·
Attempt
against the Pakistan military who is dubbed to be the mentor of these
insurgents?
·
Hate the
Americans and the NATO forces as they are the ones financed them.
·
Cease their consummate
activities to their consisting regions?
·
Challenge
their existence as intangible and influencing strength that requires
negotiations?
·
Move
together regardless of diverse advocacy of sectarianism among themselves at
certain lines?
·
Would never feel
reluctant in expanding their supportive hand to the Muslims suffering at the
hands of the infidels in different regions?
·
Does not vanish
when they are compressed upon financing or any other support?
It is the reign of Mujahedeen’s that occupies the land indifferent
to the strategic agendas penetrating the rest of the world. Address the irresistible
combats as pleases but they acknowledge blood that withstand a pillorying infidel
detaining any logic of strategic policy, benefit or interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment