Pakistani society is facing one of the toughest phases of its existence
in the name of religion it has won independence on. Islam, a code of conduct
that aims peace and love for all has been tainted into numerous colours in
Pakistan. Sectarianism is expanding like viral diseases making the society
complex enough to be united as a soul. Besides, the issues of enactment of
Shariah by fundamentalist have added fuel to the fire.
Though, the religious enforcement and maintenance need significant
attention in general. Proper teachings and application through appropriate
procedures is must in order to avoid ambiguities or misconceptions produced by self
made religious fanatics. Islam and Shariah are endorsed with open heart at
ground levels, as most of the population belongs to the middle class close
family structures. It is not something alien to be imposed irrationally or by
force whereas disintegrated scholarly class is the biggest hurdle in the
formation of a true Islamic political rule.
As far as the claimers are concerned, there is least in their
actions that may present a desire to have Shariah. It seems like the Shariah is
solely a fight for power. It is to confront the military and occupy areas to
establish a personal rule of tyranny. If Shariah is a serious approach of the
so claiming groups then it can never be established through bloodshed at any
level. Instead the terrorist acts are pissing a large majority off from the
religion which is of great concern. Competence for captivity and commanding by
militancy is arrogant enough in its nature that it can never be associated to
Shariah anywhere and especially in Pakistan.
And if it is so, then where was the dire need of Shariah when
military through US aid motivated and supported the masses to do Jihad in
Afghanistan? The money and the projection were legal then? Where were the
standard-bearers of Shariah when MMA and ANP kept bullying the whole NWFP along
with its resources during their tenures? When the politicians stake the lives
of citizens for their own motives? When people were being killed for political
motions, the Shariah was alien to the radicals. There is a lot to be answered while
Shariah comprise more at grass root before tangling into issues to administer.
Pakistan doesn’t short ruling rats that have mastery to unfurl the
worst of all in defined politics. Undoubtedly, it’s a shitty game that disgust
all involved and so will the self assumed torch bearers of Shariah. And in this
case it is prominent already for the matters of questions are why implementation
of Shariah does not include…
·
Banning of
the brothel houses in the state?
·
Limiting the
maladjustment of political agents or politicians in localities?
·
Controlling
of child abuse by the apparent saintly figures?
·
Cease the
drugging and smuggling in the tribal areas?
·
Securing the
grant of education for all specially men?
·
Prevention
of theft factors?
·
Protection
and projection of True Islamic teachings?
·
Helping the needy
as required to coup up with evilness bred in despair?
·
Defending
the adjusting territories from external threats for the sake of domestic defense?
It personally isn’t a support for the military in Pakistan rather objectionable
because unless the society will recognize its role at grounds and will control
the domestic plans of development, military will intervene. The objections on
military to raise a conflict are quite illogical for the practicality produces
more contradictions. For instance, military for monitory gains has sacrificed
the tribal people in order to gratify US and allies. Then why do tribal join
Pakistan Army? Why do we see a large number of Pakhtun in forces? Why did
military tried to make a peaceful agreement on Swat which turned out to be a mess
and in return provoked operation against the militants? Why does the
establishment secure rehabilitation and facilitation projects in the effected
areas? Why do localities accept the presence of forces in the areas as friendly
except in certain cases?
Just give a thought to who hinders Shariah specifically in
Pakistan? Shariah, the code of regulating social lives can be implemented only
among masses either the government or the establishment accord or not. It is a
peaceful process that requires general consent and exercise by the society
instead of any larger elite force with defined and controlled territory. Radicalizing
the individuals and stimulating violence that challenge the national entities
would only result back in chaos as has been seen since recent years. This has
not only destabilized the nation but also the developmental pace of the state
creating more problems at all levels.
Apart from the low percentage of leisurely class in the state, there
is a great deal of work is to be done on people. There are misconceptions about
religion and its true essence of performance. The clergy class must be well
trained and taught to elaborate Shariah among people and make it appropriate
enough to be accepted without aggression. The un-Islamic activities common in
society aren’t to be addressed by the state or establishment but somewhat by
the known ones in the society. Various segments of the state should be
visualized, searched and entertained through educating religion for curing local
evils.
We also want Shairiah but Shariah is not dependent on system rather
on individualism. Those who are Muslims and are educated understand the
religion and act accordingly. They analyze things as per religious explanation
and try to implement as directed. They have moderate attitude, humble and sensible
enough to resolve issues according to Islam. Shariah neither had any space for
radicalism nor support it.
No comments:
Post a Comment