“Don’t
you try to prove yourself that innocent, huh!” was the response I get from my
question, “what do you want from me?”
Aging is
commonly taken as most perfect, mature enough to be deprived of innocence, well
trained and very much relevant to everything around. That is why, people during
their communication expect the opponent to get everything expression anyways
despite of any noise pollution in the process or distraction in the design of
message. There is no room for innocence, ignorance, indifference and
impartiality.
If not
technical, but most common aspects must be known and experienced to the aging
otherwise, either you are lying or you are not normal making you an alien in
your existing environment. And the survival as such an individual is possible
only if one is silent or non-communicative. For, expression would raise doubts,
questions and ultimately objections on being unique.
Now
here is the point when we focus on the communication theories that describes
the social psychology of the masses who chose to be distinctive from the rest;
through their developmental patterns. It can clearly be taken as an
individual’s impact study in uses and gratification though plainly specifying
cognitive dissonance satisfied by opting alienation from the casual society. This
however, is divergent but not quite obsolete to be rejected.
There
is a strong college of thought that believes in non-delayed transparent response
therefore, doesn’t entertain diplomacy in their conversations. This, sometimes
is not appreciated, especially when turns out to be a rejection to any definite
habitual ritual or routine. Although, it can simply be the result of one’s discrete
likeness or hatred for a practice adopted by masses. For example, if a person go
against the trending of getting exposed to sexuality, even at personal level,
or disown use of technology, detain the idea of profiting market or so, he or
she is badly criticized as a psychopath, alien or soft headed.
Understanding
and accepting customary is made mandatory with aging. The freedom of gratifying
through self-amusing is allowed only when it is identical to the typical norms.
A single faces festivity pressure on going against the tides of sociality. This
originates cognitive dissonance and goes extremes when objected strictly in an
ordinary view. The more the distinctive mind is bullied, more the retaliation
comes and it cannot always be positive to be tolerated.
This
makes it extremely important to obtain that individual’s exertions related to
cognitive dissonance must not be associated to aging instead uses and
gratification. It is easier to organize and manage the social integrity by handling
such obvious brooders and trend orienteers. And an unlike single in a group can
be utilized according to its specific potential with acknowledgement in order
to sustain the chain of development.
Presumptions
on individual’s responses, contradictory rebuffing or bullying itself is
obnoxious and restrain one from being into mainstream. It unconsciously, by the
time disbar the person from normality due to consistent psychological practice
and may produce disorders. Apart, it upsets the communication cycle and
forwards misconstrued input that bring failure. This is why better
communication skills are perceived as milestone in successful achievement of
careers and tasks all around the world.
Rejection
no matter what the reason may be, is disastrous and when it comes to socializing,
the greater the pressure so the grandeur reaction. Whereas, gratification is
the essence of mental satisfaction so when hindered or oppressed, is a
challenged obsession at stake of anything. And with age, disregarding
everything strengthens the determination for human nature is rebellious. It is
unpredictable in its capacity to pose itself as a flotsam.
No comments:
Post a Comment